vilnux Español Free audit →
Finding 09 · First-party data

Your Search Console has impressions no person made

Two kinds of robot inflate your impressions: the ones that track rankings and the ones that measure AI visibility. Neither clicks. We checked it on our own two websites.

Search Console counts as impressions searches no person made. On joseredondo.es, between 1 July and 20 September 2026, 28.5% of query impressions came from rows with no clicks below position 50 or shaped like a GEO tool prompt. Without them, the average position goes from 28.9 to 22.6. The most reliable signal is clicks: a robot does not click.

Sample
Two websites of our own, Search Console web search export: joseredondo.es (544 queries, 10,954 impressions) and vilnux.com (27 pages, 15 queries)
Period
joseredondo.es: 1 July to 20 September 2026 · vilnux.com: 6 to 20 September 2026
Method
Any row with no clicks that either only shows up below position 50 or looks like a tool prompt (a persona such as "as a director of…", an instruction to the model, or 20 words or more) is flagged as a likely crawler. The average position, weighted by impressions, is then recalculated with and without those rows.
Language
Spanish and English

Where it comes from

On 22 September, Álvaro Peña de Luna published that on his website, mencoro.com, 86.5% of 90 days of impressions had been made by third-party rank trackers: 84,401 impressions, 136 clicks, and an average position of 36.6 that, filtered, was 18.2. His post (in Spanish) explains how he spotted it. Those figures are his, not our measurement.

Our engine reads Search Console in four places: to suggest questions to measure in AI, for quick wins, to cross-check the sitemap and for the classic search block. So we exported Search Console for our two websites and went through it row by row.

Two kinds of robot, not one

The first is the one Álvaro described: tools that track rankings. They ask for the top hundred results, so they leave impressions at positions no person sees, and they never click. On joseredondo.es that is 103 queries and 1,336 impressions below position 50 with no clicks.

The second we did not expect: AI visibility tools running their prompt batteries against Google AI Mode, which Search Console counts as web search. They are easy to recognise: "as the director of a real estate agency… what do G2 users say about…?", "as the manager of a medical clinic…", instructions such as "you must give a forced ranking". On joseredondo.es there are 160 such queries, 721 impressions and 0 clicks. They rank high — half of them at position 3 or better — so the position filter does not catch them.

Every click in joseredondo.es's query report comes from short searches. Not one query shaped like a tool prompt has a single click.

Is it us? A little, very little. We measure joseredondo.es with our own engine, including in Google AI Mode. Of its 544 queries, only 4 match our prompts (13 impressions). The batteries with personas and G2 reviews are not ours.

What came out on our two websites

ImpressionsClicksSuspicious rows% of impressionsAverage positionWithout the suspicious rows
joseredondo.es · queries7,22514263 of 54428.5%28.922.6
vilnux.com · pages9615 of 2761.5%57.49.3
vilnux.com · queries52015 of 15100%90.2—

Search Console's query report leaves out anonymised queries, which is why its clicks (14) are fewer than the website total (66).

On vilnux.com, a website launched in August, it is almost all noise: all 15 queries in the report sit below position 60 and none has a click, and 72.4% of impressions come from outside Spain. The query with the most impressions, "visibility checking tool", is exactly what visibility tool vendors track — in other words, the competition.

What we did with that data before looking at it this way

On 17 September we reoriented a vilnux.com page towards those queries, because it looked like demand already existed and ranking was what was missing. With this filter, no click backs that demand. The page stays, because it answers a real question in the sector, but the decision was made on data that was probably not human, and we are saying so.

On joseredondo.es, six of the queries our engine suggested as "quick wins" were persona prompts from other tools. They no longer appear.

How to spot it in your Search Console

What we changed in the engine

From today, Search Console is downloaded filtered to the client's market, with the daily series and the country breakdown, and the report the client uploads is used as well. Suspicious rows no longer count as demand when suggesting questions, for quick wins or when prioritising sitemap pages. And the dashboard warns when part of the impressions looks more like a robot than a person, with the criterion visible and the average position recalculated without them.

What this finding does NOT prove

Frequently asked questions

Do rank trackers show up in Google Search Console?

They can. They query Google daily to see where each website ranks, and those searches generate impressions without clicks. On joseredondo.es, 103 queries with 1336 impressions only showed up below position 50 with no clicks.

Why does Search Console show queries like "as the director of… what do G2 users say about…"?

Because AI visibility tools run prompt batteries against Google AI Mode, and Search Console counts them as searches. On joseredondo.es there are 160 such queries, with 721 impressions and no clicks.

Why does my Search Console average position not add up?

Because it mixes impressions no person saw: rank trackers, far down the page, and tool prompts, sometimes near the top. Remove rows with no clicks below position 50 and rows shaped like prompts, and recalculate.

How do I filter robot traffic in Search Console?

Search Console does not let you exclude it directly. The practical route is to filter by your country, set aside rows with no clicks below position 50 or shaped like prompts, check whether weekends stop dropping, and decide with clicks rather than impressions.

Does this affect AI visibility measurement?

Not the measurement itself, which asks AI search engines directly. It does affect decisions made with Search Console, such as which questions to measure or which pages to prioritise; that is why we filter those rows before using them.

Other findings Google AI Mode cited 67% less · Measurement is not stable · Every engine reads a different internet · A metric that cannot fail · Does ChatGPT traffic convert better? · The Spanish trade fair sector · What flipping the switch actually costs · Two audits of the same website · LinkedIn as a source · An agent looks for the price

← All findings

Published 23 September 2026
Home · Methodology · Plans & pricing · X · Product Hunt